tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2129884466436576116.post4146694238519404138..comments2024-02-14T12:43:04.624+00:00Comments on Crosswhatfields?: Paddy Power refused planning permissionSuehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07914930883748622529noreply@blogger.comBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2129884466436576116.post-81553348079710532792010-04-17T12:04:15.160+01:002010-04-17T12:04:15.160+01:00The story is thus:
Unril recently Sean and Declan ...The story is thus:<br />Unril recently Sean and Declan own the freehold to the New Cross Inn and the Deptford Arms. The landlord of the New Cross Inn is Simon Nundy who is running for Mayor (he rented off Sean and Declan). Sean and Declan are I understand bankrupt and the Inn is now owned by the bank. I imagine the arms is now owned by Paddy Power if they have applied for planning permission for it unless they would do so before buying, which seems unlikely.Jamesnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2129884466436576116.post-34297099389845475392010-04-12T23:26:21.515+01:002010-04-12T23:26:21.515+01:00Wilshaw Lass, they have got the gambling license, ...Wilshaw Lass, they have got the gambling license, they just didn't get the permission to put up the green signs and shutters and satellite dishes...so far...so yes, there could be a seventh bookies on the high street.Suehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07914930883748622529noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2129884466436576116.post-55882822272818353402010-04-12T22:38:12.088+01:002010-04-12T22:38:12.088+01:00sorry i'm abit confused here , so are you sayi...sorry i'm abit confused here , so are you saying their going to turn the pub into yet another bookies on deptford high st ? ..wilshaw lassnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2129884466436576116.post-55070325827918409922010-04-12T03:15:09.388+01:002010-04-12T03:15:09.388+01:00So they'll do what they want and Lewisham won&...So they'll do what they want and Lewisham won't do anything about it...?Mushroomnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2129884466436576116.post-63646938549605070422010-04-09T00:48:29.418+01:002010-04-09T00:48:29.418+01:00What pub is that then? Only good pubs in this area...What pub is that then? Only good pubs in this area are Royal Albert and Dog and Bell, so you must mean...?Mushroomnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2129884466436576116.post-37753343618867680282010-04-08T18:02:01.078+01:002010-04-08T18:02:01.078+01:00Similar to another pub owner we know, eh? Trying t...Similar to another pub owner we know, eh? Trying to get maximum return on minimum outlay...Suehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07914930883748622529noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2129884466436576116.post-40889376144510153622010-04-08T15:54:27.049+01:002010-04-08T15:54:27.049+01:00Declan's a tricky customer...err, no he's ...Declan's a tricky customer...err, no he's not a customer, is he? Evidently, he's a tricky landlord.Marmosethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12393430738344326838noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2129884466436576116.post-6422840706676195462010-04-08T15:49:57.053+01:002010-04-08T15:49:57.053+01:00One of the barmaids in the DA (no names,no pack dr...One of the barmaids in the DA (no names,no pack drill) bought me a drink this afternoon for passing on the info about Lewisham Planning. She said that I'd told her more in 3 minutes than Declan had told her in 3 months...Walrushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08651807478692274506noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2129884466436576116.post-69203138879975972472010-04-08T09:25:31.394+01:002010-04-08T09:25:31.394+01:00Oops, sorry Sue, your explanation for the 43/45 di...Oops, sorry Sue, your explanation for the 43/45 discrepancy looks more convincing.Marmosethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12393430738344326838noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2129884466436576116.post-60932685988378625382010-04-08T09:17:01.349+01:002010-04-08T09:17:01.349+01:00Good news for now and a big thanks to the Reginald...Good news for now and a big thanks to the Reginald Road and High Street residents who petitioned against it. <br /><br />(It is a bit confusing that the refusal notice only appears to show one objection when there were 45 signatures - and 43 addresses, presumably because 2 objectors didn't give theirs.)Marmosethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12393430738344326838noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2129884466436576116.post-85620419914141710172010-04-07T23:44:27.562+01:002010-04-07T23:44:27.562+01:00Oops wrong again...Neighbours is 1-45, but the fir...Oops wrong again...Neighbours is 1-45, but the first two aren't listed. But there were 5 consultees which also included Environmental Health, Deptford Street Traders and Deptford High Street Association...Suehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07914930883748622529noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2129884466436576116.post-14239400248208742742010-04-07T23:40:17.507+01:002010-04-07T23:40:17.507+01:00There's a list on my link "here"...i...There's a list on my link "here"...it's in the Planning notice as 'Neighbours and Representatives' then there's a link 'Click here for a list'. All living in Reginald Road or on the High Street. They must've been treated as "one" in the objections...Consultee One was the Conservation Officer, and Consultee Two was Highways & Transportation, then Neighbours was 3-45. (I'll have to correct my post!)Suehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07914930883748622529noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2129884466436576116.post-91160778541806929562010-04-07T23:17:34.198+01:002010-04-07T23:17:34.198+01:00Good news for now. But which 45 neighbours petitio...Good news for now. But which 45 neighbours petitioned against it? According to the website only one objection was received.helenanoreply@blogger.com